Dirty Defence or Deadly Giveaway? The Woodcock's Flawed Escape Plan
A surprising new study challenges the idea that defecating on eggs is protective - and suggests it may endanger the nest.
Signs in the Leaf Litter
Incubating birds are often models of patience and concealment, especially cryptic breeders like the Eurasian Woodcock (Scolopax rusticola). Yet new research by Sládecek and colleagues reveals a surprisingly messy side to these elusive birds. When flushed from their nests, female woodcocks frequently defecate and shed feathers - behaviours thought to be triggered by acute stress. But whether this strategy protects their eggs or merely improves the female’s odds of survival remains uncertain.
In an ambitious study published in *Ecology and Evolution*, researchers analysed 399 photographs of Eurasian Woodcock nests drawn from social media, wildlife databases and online platforms. Their goal was to document the presence of faeces and feathers immediately after the female departed. Remarkably, fresh faeces were visible in 54% of nests, and feathers - sometimes including large flight feathers - were present in 67%. In over a third of cases, both were found together.
The study proposes that these behaviours represent a rarely considered escape mechanism in cryptic birds. In particular, the authors suggest that defecation and so-called ‘fright moulting’ may distract predators and aid the female’s escape, even if they inadvertently compromise the nest’s concealment.
Fear, Faeces and Feather Loss
While defecation during escape is well documented in some ducks and colonial breeders, its occurrence in solitary, cryptic species like the Woodcock is more puzzling. One theory holds that faeces may protect the eggs by making them unpalatable to predators. But findings in other species have shown mixed results: predators may in fact be drawn to the nest by the scent or visual cues of fresh droppings.
More compelling is the idea that the behaviour helps the female escape. Faeces or shed feathers might momentarily distract a predator, allowing the female to flee. The release of small clouds of feathers - sometimes including wing feathers - could mimic the ‘ink cloud’ strategy of an octopus, confounding the pursuer.
This kind of fright-induced feather shedding, known as 'fright moulting', is largely undocumented in incubating birds, though it has been observed in other contexts. The researchers propose that both faecal release and feather loss may be by-products of a high-stress response, mediated by the sympathetic nervous system, as the bird is startled into flight at very close range.
A Risk to the Nest?
Crucially, the study casts doubt on the idea that these behaviours benefit the eggs. In most cases, faeces were deposited near rather than on the eggs, and flight feathers scattered around the nest could act as beacons to predators. Woodcock faeces are unlikely to be chemically repellent to predators, as their incubation schedules allow for regular feeding and normal digestion, unlike fasting ducks whose altered faeces have deterrent properties.
Moreover, there is evidence that Woodcocks sometimes abandon nests after being flushed, particularly early in incubation. The observed behaviours may thus reflect a strategy focused on the female’s survival, not the safeguarding of the clutch.
The Power of Public Imagery
The methodology itself is noteworthy. Rather than relying on fieldwork alone - a difficult prospect given the species’ extraordinary camouflage and secretive habits - the authors compiled a broad and diverse dataset using photographs from citizen science platforms, social media, and personal contacts.
This highlights the growing potential of open-access image databases in behavioural ecology. In this case, they offered a rare window into the secretive nesting behaviour of a widely distributed but poorly studied species.
Future Questions and Conservation Implications
The study raises intriguing questions about stress responses and anti-predator strategies in cryptic birds more broadly. Do other ground-nesting species that rely on camouflage also defecate or shed feathers when disturbed? How widespread is fright moulting among incubating birds?
From a conservation perspective, the findings are a reminder that research activities themselves may inadvertently harm sensitive species. Flushing a Woodcock may not only risk desertion but could leave tell-tale signs that increase nest predation. The authors recommend minimising disturbance, and, where unavoidable, even cleaning affected nests post-visit to restore their camouflage.
Ultimately, this research adds a striking new dimension to our understanding of breeding ecology - revealing that for some birds, escape is not just about flight, but what they leave behind.
July 2025
Share this story
